Cyberhate

The work of the Board last week was dominated by the visit of Jonathan Vick, Assistant Director: Cyberhate Response at the Anti-Defamation League of Bnai B’rith (ADL). Our purpose in having Jonathan come out was two-fold. We wanted to get practical advice from him in terms of pursuing our own specific work in combating online antisemitism and we wanted him to share his experience and expertise with those – both in government and in civil society – who are dealing with the similar online hate issues. In dealing with cyberhate the ADL has made significant advances, particularly when compared with most law enforcement agencies around the world who have barely commenced trying to deal with these types of crimes. 

The Board arranged a full programme for Jonathan to engage with government officials, law enforcement agencies and civil society organisations as well as the Hate Crimes Working Group. Internally, Jonathan participated in a “confronting cyberhate” workshop with Board and CSO staff and addressed representatives of Jewish communal organisations in both Johannesburg and Cape Town.

Cyber hatred is especially prevalent in times of social or political unrest. We saw this locally during the Fees Must Fall crisis, which was marked, and to a large extent fueled by a continual flood of inflammatory, racist and abusive exchanges on social media. It also contributed significantly to this year’s US presidential elections being so brutal and divisive, with civilized discourse being all but drowned out by racist, sexist, antisemitic and xenophobic vitriol. The targeting of Jewish journalists in the US for online antisemitic abuse was so widespread this year that the ADL issued a special report specifically devoted to this issue.   

Brittan Heller, the ADL’s Director of Technology and Society, readily acknowledges that eliminating cyberhate while respecting the internet’s norms of free speech is “an ambitious quest”. It can be achieved however, through the international community making a sustained, united effort to confront the problem and devoting the necessary resources to resolving it. As she writes, “We need designers and user experience specialists focused on enhancing empathy and designing tools to eliminate hate. We need like-minded coders, bloggers, and inventors to create solutions that permit free speech but encourage tolerance, civil discourse, and inclusiveness. Additionally, we need the major players—Twitter, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Apple—to double down on their efforts to hack the solution to this perennial problem”.

I agree with Heller and would add that every one of us has an obligation to express whatever we wish to say online in a courteous, respectful and sensitive manner, even and indeed especially regarding issues about which we feel strongly. It is up to us all to create and enhance  a culture of civil and respectful dialogue, both by distancing ourselves from those who abuse these values and by resisting the temptation ourselves  to sink  to such levels regardless of the provocation.

Recent Articles

No basis for Israel-apartheid analogy

Confronted with the charge that Israel is equivalent to Apartheid South Africa, it is tempting simply to retort that it is probably the only country in the Middle East that is not an apartheid state. One could further make an ostensibly compelling case as to why this is so. Take the example of Iran, where the only non-Muslims allowed to become Members of Parliament are those elected by their respective communities to the five seats reserved for religious minorities. Does this not call to mind the separate seats for ‘Bantu’ and ‘Coloured’ representatives elected on separate voters’ rolls in the apartheid parliament? In Yemen, there reportedly remain restrictions on Jews with regard to places of residence - Group Areas Act?

Campaign spurs antisemitic actions

At the opening of this year’s “Israel Apartheid Week” (IAW), former President Kgalema Motlanthe warned the BDS organisers of the event against allowing antisemitism to creep into their campaign: “Antisemitic actions couched in the language of human rights, and disguised by its discourse cannot be countenanced. Such actions not only undermine the humanity of a people, and entrench a painful history, but also serve to undermine our commitment to principled and moral action. It is crucial that the struggle for human rights and an end to oppression be absolutely severed from such religious intolerance and bigotry.”