Adv. Thembeka stated that the UCT Council chose to bear the financial consequences of its resolutions because of the “moral imperative” to boycott Israel. Yet it seems UCT felt no comparable moral imperative to protect its own Jewish students and academics from the antisemitism and discrimination they have faced on the UCT campus — the very community the Council is meant to SAFEGUARD!! Nor did the Council appear moved by the plight of the 288 students whose funding would be j

SAJFP legal team challenging the legal requirements of UCT Council to consult stakeholders, say non-Jews should be included. We see the claim that "those who would be accused of antisemitism should also be spoken to" would be like demanding the AWB be consulted on definition of racism. #StopAntisemitismOnUCT @BroadattheBoard @CapeTimesSA @CapeTalk @sajewishreport @ADL @uctjustkidding @News24 @SABCNews

Adv Tembeka Ngcukaitobi SC is presenting the UCT council’s case Judge Sher has debated that weight needed to be attached to the financial consequences of the decision to adopt the resolution including financial loss of R200 million donation to the UCT from Donald Gordon Foundation, 288 students not being funded by the Dell foundation and the donation of a hospital to UCT. This was due to the fact that the resolution to change the definition of Antisemitism was in conflict to