Charisse Zeifert

Charisse Zeifert writes for Saturday Citizen


Have you heard the joke where a Jew, an Afrikaner and an Indian walk into a Shebeen? It sounds like the kind of “witty” yarn that EFF leader Julius Malema would spin. Oh, wait, actually, he has already told tales about different minorities – singling them out for abuse. Most recently, he “cleverly” managed to insult two minority groups at the same time, when he said: “There’s a group of white right-wingers (read Afrikaners) who are being trained by Jews in Pretoria to be snipers.” (sic)


South Africa is on a knife’s edge when it comes to racial tensions. The anger and outrage that followed Adam Caztavelos racist rant is indicative of the fact that South Africans are no longer going to tolerate this kind of talk in our country. And rightly so.


Yet, singling out minorities for special opprobrium still seem to be somehow not only acceptable, but also widely accepted by the public at large. It is as if there is an unwritten rule for politicians in which minorities are considered to be fair game for attack, when political acumen is no longer an option. The less able you are to attract support using good governance and policies, the more likely your bigotry will show. And, the closer we get to elections, the more bizarre the comments. It would seem that extra points are awarded to you, if you are able to in fact pit one minority against another. Who can forget Marius Fransman’s pathetic and useless attempts to garner votes for the ANC in the Western Cape when he set in opposition Muslims against Jews through falsely asserting that Jewish businessmen were unfairly benefiting at the expense of their Muslim counterparts because of the policies of the DA? More recently, ANC MPP in the Western Cape Sharon Davids outrageously claimed that the drought crisis had been orchestrated by the DA to benefit what she called “the Jewish mafia”. The Indian community has similarly been defamed by EFF spokespeople, including accusations that they are economically exploiting black people, of being anti-black racists and of having their very identity as South Africans called into question. Just as Catzavelos’ revolting racial slurs are unacceptable, so is rhetoric like this not OK.


If politicians see their citizens as political footballs, something they can kick around for easy point-scoring, they have to understand that each and every one of us in this country will be the loser. They will create a society in which hate and discrimination will (again) flourish, an environment where any and all forms of racism will (again) be seen as socially acceptable and tensions among us will (again) be enflamed.

And, this is no laughing matter. Earlier this week, Julius Malema met with the South African Jewish Board of Deputies, during which he noted that he hadn’t intended to upset the Jewish community with his comments. Indeed! Perhaps, of all people, political leaders have an obligation to respect our Constitution, in letter and spirit, regardless of their ideology. They should not stand in the way of us ordinary citizens who are committed to building a society based on tolerance and respect.

Read the article here.

Recent Articles

RACISM: DO THE DUCK TEST

Zev Krengel writes in the Sunday Independent.  His piece is a response to Zane Dangor who questioned whether Jewish leadership were using criticism of Israel to silence debate.  In this article Krengel applies the “Duck test” as an indication of antisemitism.

Yanir Grindler writes for the Daily Maverick "The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is complex enough without the shouting."

Equating Zionism with racism is far too easy a way out of proper debate around the roots of the conflict in the Middle East, and Israel Apartheid Week serves to exacerbate rather than defuse the tensions. The time has come for rational debate in an attempt to find common ground between the two opposing sides, rather than slogan-shouting.