The SAJBD clarifies case against Mngxitama hate speech

The SAJBD notes the confusion as to which equality court the Andile Mngxitama hate speech case should be heard in. The SAJBD lodged the complaint with the Johannesburg High Court, and they in turn, referred it to the Magistrate’s Court. The Magistrate’s Court have indicated that this was an incorrect referral. 

The issues are of a procedural nature and do not touch on the merits of the case. Our legal team is considering all legal options to take the case forward on its merits.

The SAJBD remains committed to ensuring that this case is heard by the appropriate court. Not only is it important for the South African Jewish community, but for all South Africans committed to fighting against hate speech and racism.

Recent Articles

Not consulting Jewry renders UCT resolutions 'unlawful'

“The irony is that Mendelsohn is on the side of UCT, and UCT isn’t,” lamenting that in court, the lawyer representing the institution “never represented UCT’s interests, only those of its chairperson and executive [Exco].”

Read article below about the University of Cape Town court case regarding councils adopted resolutions to boycott Israel and change the definitions of Antisemitism.

University of Pretoria to the University of Johannesburg 20th Anniversary celebration

From Pretoria to Johannesburg!

A day that began at the University of Pretoria and concluded at the University of Johannesburg 20th Anniversary celebration - a testament to the power of connection, collaboration, and community. The SAJBD remains committed to engaging with universities across South Africa, fostering partnerships and meaningful dialogue on behalf of the South African Jewish community. 🇿🇦🤝